Cuba vs Dominican Republic: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cuba
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 132.91 t against 116.07 t in Cuba, a difference of 16.84 t.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 120th and Dominican Republic ranks 117th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Dominican Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 106.17 t | 80.07 t | 26.1 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 105.64 t | 88.32 t | 17.32 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 111.67 t | 92.01 t | 19.66 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 129.23 t | 86.15 t | 43.09 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 120.76 t | 101.43 t | 19.33 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 127.26 t | 111.19 t | 16.07 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 116.07 t | 123.38 t | 7.31 t | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Cuba or Dominican Republic?
- Dominican Republic, at 132.91 t against 116.07 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Cuba and Dominican Republic?
- 16.84 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Dominican Republic?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Dominican Republic rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Cuba ranks 120th and Dominican Republic ranks 117th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).