Czechia vs Malawi: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechia
- Malawi
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 1,180 t against 1,074 t in Malawi, a difference of 106 t.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 54th and Malawi ranks 55th of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,541 t | 669.68 t | 871.45 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 1,462 t | 820.05 t | 641.6 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 1,422 t | 961.34 t | 461.12 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 1,235 t | 1,065 t | 169.59 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Czechia or Malawi?
- Czechia, at 1,180 t against 1,074 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Czechia and Malawi?
- 106 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Malawi?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Malawi rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechia ranks 54th and Malawi ranks 55th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).