Djibouti vs Kiribati: Seed — Cropland phosphorus

Djibouti
0 t
in 2023
Kiribati
0 t
in 2023
Djibouti rank
198th
Kiribati rank
198th

Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Djibouti
  • Kiribati
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Kiribati, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.

Djibouti ranks 198th and Kiribati ranks 198th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1970s 0 t 0.0002 t 0.0002 t Kiribati
1980s 0 t 0.0027 t 0.0027 t Kiribati
1990s 0 t 0.0043 t 0.0043 t Kiribati
2000s 0.0345 t 0.0057 t 0.0288 t Djibouti
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Djibouti or Kiribati?
Djibouti, at 0 t against 0 t in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Djibouti and Kiribati?
0 t, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Kiribati?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Djibouti and Kiribati rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
Djibouti ranks 198th and Kiribati ranks 198th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).