Ecuador vs Guyana: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ecuador
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 104.68 t against 99.11 t in Ecuador, a difference of 5.57 t.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 131st and Guyana ranks 130th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Guyana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 239.16 t | 78.12 t | 161.04 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 190.78 t | 80.06 t | 110.71 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 205.58 t | 75.76 t | 129.82 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 288.31 t | 78.27 t | 210.05 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 259.63 t | 88.93 t | 170.69 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 122.2 t | 108.18 t | 14.02 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 97.15 t | 106.12 t | 8.97 t | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Ecuador or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 104.68 t against 99.11 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Ecuador and Guyana?
- 5.57 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Guyana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Guyana rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Ecuador ranks 131st and Guyana ranks 130th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).