El Salvador vs Saudi Arabia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- El Salvador
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 134.35 t against 131.44 t in El Salvador, a difference of 2.91 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 106th and Saudi Arabia ranks 104th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 64.8 t | 67.98 t | 3.17 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 1970s | 88.46 t | 64.36 t | 24.09 t | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 77.74 t | 293.04 t | 215.3 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 86.5 t | 388.76 t | 302.27 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 101.45 t | 286.15 t | 184.7 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 140.47 t | 114.98 t | 25.49 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 133.81 t | 122.72 t | 11.08 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, El Salvador or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 134.35 t against 131.44 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between El Salvador and Saudi Arabia?
- 2.91 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Saudi Arabia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- El Salvador ranks 106th and Saudi Arabia ranks 104th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).