Eritrea vs Lesotho: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eritrea
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 31.92 t against 29.91 t in Eritrea, a difference of 2.01 t.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Lesotho ahead.
Eritrea ranks 135th and Lesotho ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28.77 t | 18.81 t | 9.97 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 25.13 t | 19.23 t | 5.9 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 30.14 t | 15.9 t | 14.24 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 29.79 t | 23.46 t | 6.33 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Eritrea or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 31.92 t against 29.91 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 2.01 t, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Lesotho rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Eritrea ranks 135th and Lesotho ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).