Eritrea vs South Sudan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eritrea
- South Sudan
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 29.91 t against 27.73 t in South Sudan, a difference of 2.18 t.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 146th and South Sudan ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.08 t | 27.01 t | 3.07 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 29.79 t | 28.61 t | 1.18 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Eritrea or South Sudan?
- Eritrea, at 29.91 t against 27.73 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 2.18 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and South Sudan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Eritrea ranks 146th and South Sudan ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).