Estonia vs Japan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Estonia
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 395.12 t against 329.75 t in Estonia, a difference of 65.37 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 96th and Japan ranks 94th of 201 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 382.1 t | 521.32 t | 139.22 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 297.25 t | 440.64 t | 143.4 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 296.89 t | 395.12 t | 98.23 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 340.85 t | 395.12 t | 54.27 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Estonia or Japan?
- Japan, at 395.12 t against 329.75 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Estonia and Japan?
- 65.37 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Japan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Japan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Estonia ranks 96th and Japan ranks 94th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).