Estonia vs Sierra Leone: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Estonia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 402.77 t against 329.75 t in Estonia, a difference of 73.02 t.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 96th and Sierra Leone ranks 93rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 382.1 t | 263.09 t | 119.01 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 297.25 t | 324.68 t | 27.43 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 296.89 t | 340.6 t | 43.71 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 340.85 t | 413.77 t | 72.92 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Estonia or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 402.77 t against 329.75 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Estonia and Sierra Leone?
- 73.02 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Sierra Leone?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Sierra Leone rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Estonia ranks 96th and Sierra Leone ranks 93rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).