Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Estonia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 329.75 t against 301.94 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 27.81 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 382.1 t | 397.29 t | 15.19 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 297.25 t | 405.51 t | 108.26 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 296.89 t | 280.91 t | 15.98 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 340.85 t | 312.56 t | 28.29 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Estonia or Zimbabwe?
- Estonia, at 329.75 t against 301.94 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Estonia and Zimbabwe?
- 27.81 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Estonia ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).