Eswatini vs Jordan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eswatini
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 18.04 t against 14.17 t in Eswatini, a difference of 3.87 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 153rd and Jordan ranks 151st of 201 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.39 t | 123.32 t | 112.93 t | Jordan |
| 1970s | 9.67 t | 91.23 t | 81.55 t | Jordan |
| 1980s | 13.62 t | 51.77 t | 38.15 t | Jordan |
| 1990s | 14.66 t | 59.65 t | 44.99 t | Jordan |
| 2000s | 8.37 t | 45.22 t | 36.85 t | Jordan |
| 2010s | 15.13 t | 39.41 t | 24.28 t | Jordan |
| 2020s | 14.9 t | 23.62 t | 8.72 t | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Eswatini or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 18.04 t against 14.17 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Eswatini and Jordan?
- 3.87 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jordan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Jordan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Eswatini ranks 153rd and Jordan ranks 151st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).