Eswatini vs Luxembourg: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eswatini
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 16.06 t against 14.17 t in Eswatini, a difference of 1.89 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Eswatini ranks 153rd and Luxembourg ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.37 t | 14.23 t | 5.86 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 15.13 t | 21.32 t | 6.19 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 14.9 t | 16.06 t | 1.15 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Eswatini or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 16.06 t against 14.17 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Eswatini and Luxembourg?
- 1.89 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Luxembourg rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Eswatini ranks 153rd and Luxembourg ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).