Finland vs Greece: Seed — Cropland phosphorus

Finland
1,025 t
in 2023
Greece
982.22 t
in 2023
Finland rank
58th
Greece rank
61st

Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Finland
  • Greece
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 1,025 t against 982.22 t in Greece, a difference of 42.78 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Greece ahead.

Finland ranks 58th and Greece ranks 61st of 201 countries.

Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Greece Difference Ahead
1960s 1,116 t 1,318 t 202.3 t Greece
1970s 1,105 t 1,312 t 206.93 t Greece
1980s 1,055 t 1,492 t 437.22 t Greece
1990s 909.5 t 1,564 t 654.58 t Greece
2000s 1,095 t 1,424 t 328.43 t Greece
2010s 975.18 t 1,148 t 173.11 t Greece
2020s 1,045 t 1,139 t 93.97 t Greece

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Finland or Greece?
Finland, at 1,025 t against 982.22 t in Greece as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Finland and Greece?
42.78 t, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Greece?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Finland and Greece rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
Finland ranks 58th and Greece ranks 61st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).