France vs Myanmar: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- France
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 6,264 t against 4,916 t in France, a difference of 1,348 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.3 times France's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was France ahead.
France ranks 18th and Myanmar ranks 15th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, France averaged higher in 4 and Myanmar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,449 t | 4,623 t | 1,826 t | France |
| 1970s | 5,404 t | 4,698 t | 705.4 t | France |
| 1980s | 5,796 t | 4,703 t | 1,093 t | France |
| 1990s | 5,635 t | 5,126 t | 509.33 t | France |
| 2000s | 5,075 t | 6,170 t | 1,095 t | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 5,112 t | 6,398 t | 1,286 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 4,895 t | 6,323 t | 1,428 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, France or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 6,264 t against 4,916 t in France as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between France and Myanmar?
- 1,348 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do France and Myanmar rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- France ranks 18th and Myanmar ranks 15th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).