Georgia vs Tunisia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Georgia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 154.52 t against 135.08 t in Tunisia, a difference of 19.44 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tunisia ahead.
Georgia ranks 113th and Tunisia ranks 115th of 201 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 245.76 t | 490.44 t | 244.68 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 256.1 t | 434.49 t | 178.4 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 144.08 t | 417.17 t | 273.09 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 148.57 t | 215.14 t | 66.57 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Georgia or Tunisia?
- Georgia, at 154.52 t against 135.08 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Georgia and Tunisia?
- 19.44 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Tunisia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Tunisia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Georgia ranks 113th and Tunisia ranks 115th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).