Greece vs Serbia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Greece
- Serbia
How they compare
Greece currently reports 982.22 t against 919.51 t in Serbia, a difference of 62.71 t.
That makes Greece's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Greece has been ahead every year.
Greece ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 64th of 201 countries.
Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,225 t | 645.07 t | 579.55 t | Greece |
| 2010s | 1,148 t | 835.11 t | 313.18 t | Greece |
| 2020s | 1,139 t | 868.14 t | 270.39 t | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Greece or Serbia?
- Greece, at 982.22 t against 919.51 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Greece and Serbia?
- 62.71 t, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Greece and Serbia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Greece ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 64th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).