Guatemala vs Rwanda: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Guatemala
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 293.73 t against 273.45 t in Guatemala, a difference of 20.28 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 101st and Rwanda ranks 100th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 205.9 t | 124.36 t | 81.53 t | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 211.86 t | 145.95 t | 65.91 t | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 212.82 t | 170.2 t | 42.62 t | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 187.11 t | 151.89 t | 35.22 t | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 200.68 t | 258.33 t | 57.65 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 261.34 t | 268.06 t | 6.72 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 277.61 t | 294.55 t | 16.94 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Guatemala or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 293.73 t against 273.45 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Guatemala and Rwanda?
- 20.28 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Rwanda rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Guatemala ranks 101st and Rwanda ranks 100th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).