Guinea vs Uzbekistan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Guinea
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 2,086 t against 1,704 t in Guinea, a difference of 382 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times Guinea's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 39th and Uzbekistan ranks 36th of 201 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 253.1 t | 1,846 t | 1,593 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 318.28 t | 1,736 t | 1,418 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 564.01 t | 2,635 t | 2,071 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 1,442 t | 2,143 t | 700.87 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Guinea or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 2,086 t against 1,704 t in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Guinea and Uzbekistan?
- 382 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and Uzbekistan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Guinea ranks 39th and Uzbekistan ranks 36th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).