Honduras vs Mongolia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Honduras
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 109.18 t against 106.5 t in Honduras, a difference of 2.68 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.
Honduras ranks 125th and Mongolia ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 48.29 t | 159.94 t | 111.65 t | Mongolia |
| 1970s | 59.53 t | 222.57 t | 163.04 t | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 77.99 t | 352.73 t | 274.74 t | Mongolia |
| 1990s | 92.46 t | 263.16 t | 170.7 t | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 105.26 t | 110.12 t | 4.86 t | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 101.71 t | 146.41 t | 44.71 t | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 105.76 t | 132.66 t | 26.9 t | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Honduras or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 109.18 t against 106.5 t in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Honduras and Mongolia?
- 2.68 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Mongolia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Mongolia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Honduras ranks 125th and Mongolia ranks 123rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).