Hungary vs Lithuania: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Hungary
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 1,457 t against 1,441 t in Hungary, a difference of 16 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 48th and Lithuania ranks 46th of 201 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,031 t | 1,650 t | 381.03 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 1,438 t | 1,276 t | 162.15 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 1,698 t | 1,395 t | 303.06 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 1,531 t | 1,353 t | 177.62 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Hungary or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 1,457 t against 1,441 t in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Hungary and Lithuania?
- 16 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Lithuania rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Hungary ranks 48th and Lithuania ranks 46th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).