Indonesia vs Yugoslav SFR: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Indonesia
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 2,145 t against 2,122 t in Indonesia, a difference of 23 t.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 30th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 29th of 186 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,724 t | 3,355 t | 368.5 t | Indonesia |
| 1970s | 3,856 t | 3,152 t | 704.06 t | Indonesia |
| 1980s | 4,200 t | 2,800 t | 1,400 t | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 4,533 t | 2,434 t | 2,099 t | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Indonesia or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 2,145 t against 2,122 t in Indonesia as of 1991.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Indonesia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 23 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Indonesia and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Indonesia ranks 30th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 29th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).