Jordan vs Luxembourg: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Jordan
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 18.04 t against 16.06 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 1.98 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 151st and Luxembourg ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.22 t | 14.23 t | 30.99 t | Jordan |
| 2010s | 39.41 t | 21.32 t | 18.09 t | Jordan |
| 2020s | 23.62 t | 16.06 t | 7.56 t | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Jordan or Luxembourg?
- Jordan, at 18.04 t against 16.06 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Jordan and Luxembourg?
- 1.98 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Luxembourg rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Jordan ranks 151st and Luxembourg ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).