Kenya vs Sweden: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Kenya
- Sweden
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 792.21 t against 746.17 t in Sweden, a difference of 46.04 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Kenya ranks 71st and Sweden ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 301.69 t | 1,306 t | 1,005 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 368.98 t | 1,310 t | 940.78 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 393.41 t | 1,263 t | 869.6 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 413.44 t | 999.5 t | 586.07 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 420.1 t | 905.13 t | 485.03 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 533.27 t | 822.96 t | 289.69 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 745.08 t | 748.67 t | 3.59 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Kenya or Sweden?
- Kenya, at 792.21 t against 746.17 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Kenya and Sweden?
- 46.04 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Sweden rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Kenya ranks 71st and Sweden ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).