Latvia vs Senegal: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Latvia
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 733.41 t against 729.05 t in Latvia, a difference of 4.36 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 77th and Senegal ranks 74th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Senegal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 686.01 t | 928 t | 242 t | Senegal |
| 2000s | 564.01 t | 895.2 t | 331.19 t | Senegal |
| 2010s | 708.33 t | 682.27 t | 26.07 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 758.51 t | 981.56 t | 223.06 t | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Latvia or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 733.41 t against 729.05 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Latvia and Senegal?
- 4.36 t, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Senegal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Senegal rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Latvia ranks 77th and Senegal ranks 74th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).