Liberia vs Slovenia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus

Liberia
52.45 t
in 2023
Slovenia
55.21 t
in 2023
Liberia rank
138th
Slovenia rank
137th

Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Liberia
  • Slovenia
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 55.21 t against 52.45 t in Liberia, a difference of 2.76 t.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

Liberia ranks 138th and Slovenia ranks 137th of 201 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 44.22 t 67.69 t 23.47 t Slovenia
2000s 48.64 t 60.78 t 12.14 t Slovenia
2010s 55.24 t 60.27 t 5.02 t Slovenia
2020s 54.03 t 54.73 t 0.6995 t Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Liberia or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 55.21 t against 52.45 t in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Liberia and Slovenia?
2.76 t, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Slovenia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Liberia and Slovenia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
Liberia ranks 138th and Slovenia ranks 137th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).