Libya vs Nicaragua: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Libya
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 201.13 t against 159.91 t in Libya, a difference of 41.22 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 100th and Nicaragua ranks 97th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 4 and Nicaragua in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 226.06 t | 202.01 t | 24.05 t | Libya |
| 1970s | 226.06 t | 213.67 t | 12.39 t | Libya |
| 1980s | 226.06 t | 198.25 t | 27.81 t | Libya |
| 1990s | 226.06 t | 207.93 t | 18.13 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 226.06 t | 248.53 t | 22.47 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 208.78 t | 250.91 t | 42.13 t | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 165.63 t | 208.41 t | 42.78 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Libya or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 201.13 t against 159.91 t in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Libya and Nicaragua?
- 41.22 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Nicaragua?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Nicaragua rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Libya ranks 100th and Nicaragua ranks 97th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).