Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Nigeria: Seed — Cropland phosphorus

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
41,471 t
in 2023
Nigeria
26,296 t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
9th
Nigeria rank
6th

Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Nigeria
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 41,471 t against 26,296 t in Nigeria, a difference of 15,175 t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.6 times Nigeria's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Nigeria ranks 6th of 29 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 23,739 t 20,495 t 3,244 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 25,256 t 20,234 t 5,022 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 26,368 t 20,054 t 6,314 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 28,235 t 21,329 t 6,906 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 31,948 t 21,682 t 10,267 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 36,433 t 21,738 t 14,695 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 40,430 t 25,093 t 15,337 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Nigeria?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 41,471 t against 26,296 t in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Nigeria?
15,175 t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Nigeria rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Nigeria ranks 6th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Nigeria: Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/seed-cropland-phosphorus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/seed-cropland-phosphorus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/nigeria/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Nigeria: Seed — Cropland phosphorus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).