Luxembourg vs Melanesia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Luxembourg
- Melanesia
How they compare
Melanesia currently reports 20.65 t against 16.06 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 4.59 t.
That makes Melanesia's figure about 1.3 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Melanesia ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 152nd and Melanesia ranks 150th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Melanesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.23 t | 11.06 t | 3.17 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 21.32 t | 17 t | 4.32 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 16.06 t | 20.42 t | 4.36 t | Melanesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Luxembourg or Melanesia?
- Melanesia, at 20.65 t against 16.06 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Luxembourg and Melanesia?
- 4.59 t, with Melanesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Melanesia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Melanesia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Luxembourg ranks 152nd and Melanesia ranks 150th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).