Madagascar vs Peru: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Madagascar
- Peru
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 902.75 t against 900.59 t in Peru, a difference of 2.16 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 65th and Peru ranks 66th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 4 and Peru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 639.71 t | 612.98 t | 26.72 t | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 691.63 t | 584.87 t | 106.77 t | Madagascar |
| 1980s | 735.76 t | 596.45 t | 139.31 t | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 773.25 t | 661.55 t | 111.7 t | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 828.53 t | 953.87 t | 125.33 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 794.18 t | 917.21 t | 123.03 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 855.16 t | 946.76 t | 91.6 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Madagascar or Peru?
- Madagascar, at 902.75 t against 900.59 t in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Madagascar and Peru?
- 2.16 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Peru rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Madagascar ranks 65th and Peru ranks 66th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).