Malawi vs Nepal: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Malawi
- Nepal
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 1,074 t against 1,034 t in Nepal, a difference of 40 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 55th and Nepal ranks 57th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 516.58 t | 474.8 t | 41.78 t | Malawi |
| 1970s | 575.15 t | 550.1 t | 25.04 t | Malawi |
| 1980s | 592.26 t | 712.35 t | 120.1 t | Nepal |
| 1990s | 650.73 t | 840.37 t | 189.64 t | Nepal |
| 2000s | 820.05 t | 947.71 t | 127.66 t | Nepal |
| 2010s | 961.34 t | 1,051 t | 89.47 t | Nepal |
| 2020s | 1,065 t | 1,049 t | 16.17 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Malawi or Nepal?
- Malawi, at 1,074 t against 1,034 t in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Malawi and Nepal?
- 40 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Nepal rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Malawi ranks 55th and Nepal ranks 57th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).