Melanesia vs South Sudan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Melanesia
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 27.73 t against 20.65 t in Melanesia, a difference of 7.08 t.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.3 times Melanesia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Melanesia ranks 150th and South Sudan ranks 147th of 201 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.25 t | 27.01 t | 8.76 t | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 20.42 t | 28.61 t | 8.19 t | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Melanesia or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 27.73 t against 20.65 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Melanesia and South Sudan?
- 7.08 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and South Sudan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Melanesia ranks 150th and South Sudan ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).