Middle Africa vs Russian Federation: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Middle Africa
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 57,860 t against 3,570 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 54,290 t.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 16.2 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Middle Africa ranks 6th and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 18 groups.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,046 t | 62,637 t | 60,591 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 2,453 t | 52,342 t | 49,889 t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 3,224 t | 59,957 t | 56,733 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 3,485 t | 57,540 t | 54,055 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Middle Africa or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 57,860 t against 3,570 t in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Middle Africa and Russian Federation?
- 54,290 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Russian Federation rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Middle Africa ranks 6th and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 18 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).