Montenegro vs Tonga: Seed — Cropland phosphorus

Montenegro
0.804 t
in 2023
Tonga
0.7396 t
in 2023
Montenegro rank
169th
Tonga rank
170th

Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Montenegro
  • Tonga
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 0.804 t against 0.7396 t in Tonga, a difference of 0.0644 t.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Montenegro ranks 169th and Tonga ranks 170th of 201 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 1.61 t 1.32 t 0.2907 t Montenegro
2010s 0.2412 t 1.04 t 0.7963 t Tonga
2020s 1.21 t 0.7155 t 0.4905 t Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Montenegro or Tonga?
Montenegro, at 0.804 t against 0.7396 t in Tonga as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Montenegro and Tonga?
0.0644 t, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Tonga?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Montenegro and Tonga rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
Montenegro ranks 169th and Tonga ranks 170th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).