Oceania vs Syrian Arab Republic: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Oceania
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 4,638 t against 3,263 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 1,375 t.
That makes Oceania's figure about 1.4 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Oceania has been ahead every year.
Oceania ranks 26th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 26th of 32 groups.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,968 t | 2,482 t | 485.44 t | Oceania |
| 1970s | 3,570 t | 2,482 t | 1,088 t | Oceania |
| 1980s | 5,090 t | 2,482 t | 2,608 t | Oceania |
| 1990s | 3,725 t | 2,482 t | 1,243 t | Oceania |
| 2000s | 4,376 t | 2,482 t | 1,894 t | Oceania |
| 2010s | 4,275 t | 2,326 t | 1,948 t | Oceania |
| 2020s | 4,169 t | 2,509 t | 1,659 t | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Oceania or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Oceania, at 4,638 t against 3,263 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Oceania and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 1,375 t, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Oceania and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Oceania ranks 26th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 26th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).