Pakistan vs Ukraine: Seed — Cropland phosphorus

Pakistan
10,209 t
in 2023
Ukraine
12,508 t
in 2023
Pakistan rank
9th
Ukraine rank
8th

Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Pakistan
  • Ukraine
5.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 12,508 t against 10,209 t in Pakistan, a difference of 2,299 t.

That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.

Pakistan ranks 9th and Ukraine ranks 8th of 201 countries.

Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 8,212 t 14,974 t 6,762 t Ukraine
2000s 9,366 t 14,312 t 4,947 t Ukraine
2010s 10,253 t 15,339 t 5,086 t Ukraine
2020s 9,980 t 13,373 t 3,393 t Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Pakistan or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at 12,508 t against 10,209 t in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Pakistan and Ukraine?
2,299 t, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Ukraine?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Ukraine rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
Pakistan ranks 9th and Ukraine ranks 8th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).