Peru vs Turkmenistan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Peru
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 945.35 t against 900.59 t in Peru, a difference of 44.76 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Peru ranks 57th and Turkmenistan ranks 54th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 695.27 t | 760.34 t | 65.06 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 953.87 t | 983.88 t | 30.01 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 917.21 t | 887.77 t | 29.44 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 946.76 t | 881.84 t | 64.92 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Peru or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 945.35 t against 900.59 t in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Peru and Turkmenistan?
- 44.76 t, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Turkmenistan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Peru ranks 57th and Turkmenistan ranks 54th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).