Rwanda vs Sudan (former): Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Rwanda
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 293.73 t against 244.32 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 49.41 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Sudan (former)'s.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 100th and Sudan (former) ranks 103rd of 201 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 5 and Sudan (former) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 124.36 t | 83.2 t | 41.16 t | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 145.95 t | 116.05 t | 29.9 t | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 170.2 t | 111.68 t | 58.52 t | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 151.89 t | 189.91 t | 38.02 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 258.33 t | 249.96 t | 8.37 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 241.48 t | 240.62 t | 0.861 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Rwanda or Sudan (former)?
- Rwanda, at 293.73 t against 244.32 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Rwanda and Sudan (former)?
- 49.41 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Rwanda and Sudan (former) rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Rwanda ranks 100th and Sudan (former) ranks 103rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).