Senegal vs Sweden: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Senegal
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 746.17 t against 733.41 t in Senegal, a difference of 12.76 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Senegal ranks 74th and Sweden ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Senegal averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Senegal | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 831.03 t | 1,306 t | 475.35 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 1,058 t | 1,310 t | 251.77 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 1,030 t | 1,263 t | 233.23 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 930.25 t | 999.5 t | 69.26 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 895.2 t | 905.13 t | 9.93 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 682.27 t | 822.96 t | 140.69 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 981.56 t | 748.67 t | 232.89 t | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Senegal or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 746.17 t against 733.41 t in Senegal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Senegal and Sweden?
- 12.76 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Senegal and Sweden rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Senegal ranks 74th and Sweden ranks 73rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).