Sierra Leone vs Sudan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Sierra Leone
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 425.68 t against 402.77 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 22.91 t.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 93rd and Sudan ranks 90th of 201 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 337.28 t | 346.31 t | 9.03 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 413.77 t | 457.06 t | 43.28 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Sierra Leone or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 425.68 t against 402.77 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Sierra Leone and Sudan?
- 22.91 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sierra Leone and Sudan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Sierra Leone ranks 93rd and Sudan ranks 90th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).