Sierra Leone vs Uruguay: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Sierra Leone
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 424.41 t against 402.77 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 21.64 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 93rd and Uruguay ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 256.73 t | 370.41 t | 113.68 t | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 272.16 t | 326.24 t | 54.07 t | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 274.8 t | 267 t | 7.8 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1990s | 265.82 t | 259.54 t | 6.28 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 324.68 t | 414.59 t | 89.91 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 340.6 t | 779.74 t | 439.14 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 413.77 t | 577.86 t | 164.08 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Sierra Leone or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 424.41 t against 402.77 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Sierra Leone and Uruguay?
- 21.64 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sierra Leone and Uruguay rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Sierra Leone ranks 93rd and Uruguay ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).