Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uruguay
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 454.94 t against 424.41 t in Uruguay, a difference of 30.53 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 88th and Uruguay ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 489.36 t | 370.41 t | 118.95 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 521.47 t | 326.24 t | 195.23 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 533.36 t | 267 t | 266.36 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 518.15 t | 259.54 t | 258.61 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 525.48 t | 414.59 t | 110.89 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 491.16 t | 779.74 t | 288.58 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 467.57 t | 577.86 t | 110.29 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Sri Lanka or Uruguay?
- Sri Lanka, at 454.94 t against 424.41 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 30.53 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uruguay rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Sri Lanka ranks 88th and Uruguay ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).