Sri Lanka vs Zambia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Sri Lanka
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 472.01 t against 454.94 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 17.07 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 88th and Zambia ranks 85th of 201 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 489.36 t | 222.08 t | 267.28 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 521.47 t | 237.7 t | 283.77 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 533.36 t | 216.67 t | 316.68 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 518.15 t | 245.16 t | 272.99 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 525.48 t | 279.76 t | 245.71 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 491.16 t | 377.37 t | 113.8 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 467.57 t | 433.13 t | 34.45 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Sri Lanka or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 472.01 t against 454.94 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Sri Lanka and Zambia?
- 17.07 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and Zambia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Sri Lanka ranks 88th and Zambia ranks 85th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).