Tajikistan vs Zambia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Tajikistan
- Zambia
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 498.96 t against 472.01 t in Zambia, a difference of 26.95 t.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 83rd and Zambia ranks 85th of 201 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 260.39 t | 244.88 t | 15.51 t | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 287.76 t | 279.76 t | 8 t | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 391.48 t | 377.37 t | 14.11 t | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 517.66 t | 433.13 t | 84.53 t | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Tajikistan or Zambia?
- Tajikistan, at 498.96 t against 472.01 t in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Tajikistan and Zambia?
- 26.95 t, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Zambia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Tajikistan and Zambia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Tajikistan ranks 83rd and Zambia ranks 85th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).