USSR vs Viet Nam: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- USSR
- Viet Nam
How they compare
USSR currently reports 95,013 t against 6,775 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 88,238 t.
That makes USSR's figure about 14.0 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, USSR has been ahead every year.
USSR ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 186 countries.
USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | USSR | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 99,295 t | 4,122 t | 95,173 t | USSR |
| 1970s | 104,052 t | 4,243 t | 99,809 t | USSR |
| 1980s | 101,373 t | 4,588 t | 96,786 t | USSR |
| 1990s | 94,196 t | 4,845 t | 89,352 t | USSR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, USSR or Viet Nam?
- USSR, at 95,013 t against 6,775 t in Viet Nam as of 1991.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between USSR and Viet Nam?
- 88,238 t, with USSR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for USSR and Viet Nam?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do USSR and Viet Nam rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- USSR ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).