Angola vs Haiti: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Angola
- Haiti
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0.3706 kg/ha against 0.368 kg/ha in Haiti, a difference of 0.0026 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.
Angola ranks 95th and Haiti ranks 96th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Haiti in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1102 kg/ha | 0.1741 kg/ha | 0.0639 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1970s | 0.1237 kg/ha | 0.1954 kg/ha | 0.0717 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1980s | 0.1055 kg/ha | 0.203 kg/ha | 0.0975 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1990s | 0.1112 kg/ha | 0.1719 kg/ha | 0.0607 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2000s | 0.3467 kg/ha | 0.1638 kg/ha | 0.1829 kg/ha | Angola |
| 2010s | 0.4888 kg/ha | 0.3128 kg/ha | 0.176 kg/ha | Angola |
| 2020s | 0.3732 kg/ha | 0.3784 kg/ha | 0.0051 kg/ha | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Angola or Haiti?
- Angola, at 0.3706 kg/ha against 0.368 kg/ha in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Angola and Haiti?
- 0.0026 kg/ha, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Haiti?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Haiti rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Angola ranks 95th and Haiti ranks 96th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).