Angola vs Iraq: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Angola
- Iraq
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0.3706 kg/ha against 0.356 kg/ha in Iraq, a difference of 0.0146 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.
Angola ranks 95th and Iraq ranks 97th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1102 kg/ha | 0.3252 kg/ha | 0.215 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 1970s | 0.1237 kg/ha | 0.2565 kg/ha | 0.1328 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 1980s | 0.1055 kg/ha | 0.3 kg/ha | 0.1946 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 1990s | 0.1112 kg/ha | 0.4473 kg/ha | 0.336 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 2000s | 0.3467 kg/ha | 0.622 kg/ha | 0.2753 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 2010s | 0.4888 kg/ha | 0.4631 kg/ha | 0.0257 kg/ha | Angola |
| 2020s | 0.3732 kg/ha | 0.4626 kg/ha | 0.0893 kg/ha | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Angola or Iraq?
- Angola, at 0.3706 kg/ha against 0.356 kg/ha in Iraq as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Angola and Iraq?
- 0.0146 kg/ha, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Iraq?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Iraq rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Angola ranks 95th and Iraq ranks 97th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).