Armenia vs South America: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Armenia
- South America
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 1.17 kg/ha against 0.6355 kg/ha in South America, a difference of 0.5345 kg/ha.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.8 times South America's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 12th and South America ranks 10th of 186 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | South America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.69 kg/ha | 0.4112 kg/ha | 1.28 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2000s | 1.88 kg/ha | 0.4963 kg/ha | 1.39 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2010s | 1.65 kg/ha | 0.6059 kg/ha | 1.04 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2020s | 1.2 kg/ha | 0.6488 kg/ha | 0.5492 kg/ha | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Armenia or South America?
- Armenia, at 1.17 kg/ha against 0.6355 kg/ha in South America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Armenia and South America?
- 0.5345 kg/ha, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and South America?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and South America rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Armenia ranks 12th and South America ranks 10th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).