Asia vs Nigeria: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Asia
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 1.74 kg/ha against 0.6686 kg/ha in Asia, a difference of 1.07 kg/ha.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 2.6 times Asia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Asia ranks 7th and Nigeria ranks 4th of 32 groups.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5485 kg/ha | 2.17 kg/ha | 1.62 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 1970s | 0.5746 kg/ha | 2.06 kg/ha | 1.49 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 1980s | 0.5862 kg/ha | 1.9 kg/ha | 1.32 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 1990s | 0.5883 kg/ha | 1.7 kg/ha | 1.11 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 0.6054 kg/ha | 1.51 kg/ha | 0.9072 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 0.6158 kg/ha | 1.5 kg/ha | 0.8843 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 0.6485 kg/ha | 1.67 kg/ha | 1.02 kg/ha | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Asia or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 1.74 kg/ha against 0.6686 kg/ha in Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Asia and Nigeria?
- 1.07 kg/ha, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and Nigeria?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Asia and Nigeria rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Asia ranks 7th and Nigeria ranks 4th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).