Australia vs Ethiopia PDR: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Australia
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.2112 kg/ha against 0.2034 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.0078 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 123rd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 125th of 201 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2178 kg/ha | 0.2003 kg/ha | 0.0174 kg/ha | Australia |
| 1970s | 0.2931 kg/ha | 0.1776 kg/ha | 0.1155 kg/ha | Australia |
| 1980s | 0.3496 kg/ha | 0.1949 kg/ha | 0.1547 kg/ha | Australia |
| 1990s | 0.3085 kg/ha | 0.2103 kg/ha | 0.0982 kg/ha | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Australia or Ethiopia PDR?
- Australia, at 0.2112 kg/ha against 0.2034 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Australia and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.0078 kg/ha, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Australia and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Australia ranks 123rd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 125th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).