Australia vs Uganda: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Australia
- Uganda
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.2112 kg/ha against 0.204 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.0072 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Australia ranks 123rd and Uganda ranks 124th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2178 kg/ha | 0.2809 kg/ha | 0.0631 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1970s | 0.2931 kg/ha | 0.2604 kg/ha | 0.0327 kg/ha | Australia |
| 1980s | 0.3496 kg/ha | 0.1586 kg/ha | 0.191 kg/ha | Australia |
| 1990s | 0.3179 kg/ha | 0.2068 kg/ha | 0.111 kg/ha | Australia |
| 2000s | 0.265 kg/ha | 0.2199 kg/ha | 0.0451 kg/ha | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.2055 kg/ha | 0.1731 kg/ha | 0.0324 kg/ha | Australia |
| 2020s | 0.194 kg/ha | 0.2348 kg/ha | 0.0408 kg/ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Australia or Uganda?
- Australia, at 0.2112 kg/ha against 0.204 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Australia and Uganda?
- 0.0072 kg/ha, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Uganda rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Australia ranks 123rd and Uganda ranks 124th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).